Unit 12 · Multi-Step Conditional Reasoning
Observatory Excursion — Are Both Reasoners Correct?
Lesson 11 of 16
About this lesson
A class rule: the only children NOT going to the observatory are those playing in the soccer match. Maliyan says: Mei doesn't play soccer, so she must be going. Robyn says: Kirra isn't going, so she must be playing soccer. Both sound sensible — and for once, both ARE correct. This question is the positive counterpart to the 'necessary vs sufficient' confusion questions: sometimes BOTH people get the logic right, and the answer really is 'both'.
Chapters
Question
| Mei and Kirra's class is due to go on an excursion to an observatory so they can look at the stars through the big telescope. The only children in the class who are not going on the excursion are the ones who need to play in the soccer match. |
|---|
Maliyan: "Mei does not play soccer, so she must be going to the observatory."
Robyn: "Kirra is not going to the observatory, so she must be playing in the soccer match."
If the information in the box is true, whose reasoning is correct?
Take your OC prep further
- Sample questions & worked solutions across core OC topics
- Digital exam simulator with interactive practice sets
- Personalised progress tracking across all your devices
Already have an account? Log in here
No payment required. Compare OC plans
Give Your Child the Best Chance at OC Entry
Join NSW families preparing their children for the Opportunity Class Placement Test with the most realistic online OC practice tests available. First tests free—no credit card required.
Claim Your Free OC Practice Tests