Unit 3
Discursive Writing
About this unit
Discursive writing is the third main text type on the Selective test. Unlike persuasive tasks, you are not trying to win a debate — you are exploring an issue from more than one angle, like a thoughtful conversation.
This unit teaches hedging language, perspective pivots, and synthesis conclusions. Complete Unit 2 first so you can tell persuasion and discussion apart.
What types of questions will you face?
- 1Open "discuss" or "explore" prompts — e.g. "Discuss the role of…" or "Is X the most important thing?" You are not required to pick one winner; you must show you understand why reasonable people disagree.
- 2Values questions — winning, fairness, technology, homework, competition. Strong answers explain why each value matters to different people, not only that you like or dislike something.
- 3Stimulus + discuss — a short context box (school phone rules, community issue) followed by a discursive task. Use the facts to illustrate perspectives — do not copy them as a list.
- 4Magazine or essay audience — write for readers who want thoughtful comment, not a shouted slogan. Tone is curious and balanced, not prosecutorial.
- 5Synthesis conclusions — end by merging ideas ("It might be that…", "Perhaps the answer lies in…") rather than a blunt call to ban or allow.
Skills you will build
- Grey-area mindset — plan two points for each perspective before typing; resist "Yes/No" in the opening sentence.
- Hedging language — it could be argued, perhaps, some suggest, it appears that instead of must, always, undeniably.
- Perspective pivots — On one hand…, Conversely…, In contrast…, Nevertheless…, Alternatively… between paragraphs.
- Empathy in examples — show you understand why someone might hold the opposite view before you question it.
- Synthesis endings — merge both sides into a mature reflection; avoid empty "both are good."
- Tone check — in the last two minutes, delete persuasive phrases that slipped in ("everyone must", "the only solution").
By the end of this unit, you will be able to
- Tell discursive tasks apart from persuasive tasks and choose the correct tone.
- Explore at least two credible perspectives on an issue with specific school-life or community examples.
- Use hedging language and transitional phrases consistently across the piece.
- Write a synthesis conclusion that reflects complexity without refusing to think.
- Use a short stimulus box to support discussion rather than to argue one side only.
Difficulty profile
Discursive writing is medium difficulty for students who default to debate-mode persuasion. The hardest shift is holding balance without sounding vague — markers want structure (perspective A, perspective B, synthesis) and mature vocabulary, not endless "maybe." Practice distinguishing discursive from persuasive prompts before the exam.
Exam tip: Discursive Writing
Read the prompt twice. If it says persuade, argue, or convince, use Unit 2 skills. If it says discuss, explore, or asks whether something "is the most important", use discursive skills. Spend five minutes listing two points per side and your final synthesis line. Never open with "I strongly believe" on a discursive task.
Guided Practice
Discursive prompts punish the habit of picking a side in sentence one. The examiner wants to see that you can hold two real perspectives before you offer a mature conclusion that merges them.
Discursive writing appears regularly on Selective papers alongside narrative and persuasive. It is not a debate you must win — it is a thoughtful exploration of an issue from more than one angle.
Markers reward balance, mature tone, and a conclusion that synthesises ideas rather than picking a loud winner. They penalise essays that sound persuasive (absolute words, one-sided rant) or that list pros and cons without connecting them.
You receive an open question (e.g. "Is winning the most important thing?" or "Discuss the role of…") and about 30 minutes. You explore multiple perspectives, use hedging language, and end with a reflective conclusion — not "I think both are good."
Best approach: Before you type, jot two points for side A and two for side B, then one sentence for your synthesis ending. Open by acknowledging complexity — no "I strongly believe." Use transitions: On one hand… / Conversely… / Nevertheless…
Your writing task
Allow 25 minutes to write, then 5 minutes to edit. · In the exam, aim for roughly 350–450 words (introduction, two perspective paragraphs, synthesis conclusion).
Write a discursive piece exploring this question:
Is winning the most important thing in sport and school life?
You must:
- Explore more than one perspective (reasons winning matters and reasons it may not)
- Use hedging language (e.g. it could be argued, perhaps, some suggest) — avoid absolute persuasive words like must or always
- End with a synthesis conclusion that reflects on both sides — do not simply say "both are good"
Quick plan (before you write)
Scope sentence: acknowledge the question divides opinion.
Side A (2 points): why winning might matter — with a school or sport example.
Side B (2 points): costs or limits of focusing only on winning.
Synthesis: one mature line merging both (not a fence-sitting cliché).
Tone check: swap any "must/always" for hedged phrases.
Write your response on paper or in a notes app first. When you are ready, read the example below.
Example response
Study structure and detail — do not memorise phrases.
Example response (about 400 words — discursive)
In playgrounds, pools, and classrooms, the word winning carries a charge. Some people treat it as the point of every game; others argue that cooperation and growth matter more. The truth may sit between those poles.
On one hand, the drive to win can sharpen effort and skill. When a relay team chases a personal best, or a debating squad prepares for a regional final, a clear goal can focus practice and teach students to handle pressure. It could be argued that healthy competition pushes people to discover what they are capable of when they refuse to give up early. In that sense, winning — or striving to win — is not only about medals; it is about standards.
Conversely, an obsession with coming first can shrink what counts as success. If students believe that only gold matters, they may avoid challenges where they might lose, cheat to protect a streak, or treat teammates as obstacles. Perhaps the most damaging idea is that a narrow loss equals failure. Some suggest that this mindset follows children into friendships and tests, where comparison replaces curiosity.
There is also a difference between winning a match and winning at life. Schools celebrate grades, sports days, and awards — yet many valuable outcomes (kindness, persistence after setback, helping a peer understand a problem) never appear on a podium. It appears that communities which praise only visible victories risk teaching young people to hide struggle rather than learn from it.
Nevertheless, pretending winning does not matter at all would be unrealistic. Public games need scores; some roles — emergency workers, surgeons in training — depend on high stakes. The question is whether winning is the only metric, not whether it has any place.
Ultimately, winning can motivate without becoming a tyrant. It might be healthiest when students are asked not only "Did you come first?" but "What did you improve, and who did you help along the way?" A school that keeps both questions alive treats achievement as wider than a single ladder — and that, perhaps, is the balance worth aiming for.
Why this works
- No forced pick — explores winning's value and its dangers before concluding.
- Clear pivots — "On one hand", "Conversely", "Nevertheless" signal perspective shifts.
- Hedging — "It could be argued", "Perhaps", "Some suggest", "It appears that".
- Synthesis ending — merges ambition with wider metrics; avoids empty "both sides are fine."
Technology prompts often trap students into a persuasive rant for or against screens. Discursive writing asks you to examine benefits and harms with a calm, curious voice — especially when the audience is adults who already have opinions.
Discursive writing appears regularly on Selective papers alongside narrative and persuasive. It is not a debate you must win — it is a thoughtful exploration of an issue from more than one angle.
Markers reward balance, mature tone, and a conclusion that synthesises ideas rather than picking a loud winner. They penalise essays that sound persuasive (absolute words, one-sided rant) or that list pros and cons without connecting them.
You receive an open question (e.g. "Is winning the most important thing?" or "Discuss the role of…") and about 30 minutes. You explore multiple perspectives, use hedging language, and end with a reflective conclusion — not "I think both are good."
Best approach: Plan paragraph 2 as the "yes, but" paragraph: start with genuine benefits, then pivot with However or On the other hand to costs. In the conclusion, name who should act (families, schools) without demanding a ban unless the prompt asks for one.
Your writing task
Allow 25 minutes to write, then 5 minutes to edit. · In the exam, aim for roughly 350–450 words.
Context
Many primary schools are reviewing phone and social-media rules. Parents report both easier contact and more evening conflict; teachers see research tools used beside games during lessons.
Write a discursive piece for a school magazine discussing:
What role should social media and smartphones play in the lives of primary-aged students?
Use the context above. You must:
- Consider at least two different viewpoints
- Use transitional phrases when shifting perspective (e.g. On the other hand, In contrast, Alternatively)
- Finish with a reflective conclusion — not a one-sided attack or advertisement for phones
Quick plan (before you write)
Introduction: state that the issue is debated — no thesis that picks a winner.
Paragraph A: benefits or reasons some support access (contact, learning, creativity).
Paragraph B: concerns (distraction, sleep, comparison, safety) with examples.
Optional short paragraph: what schools/parents might balance.
Conclusion: synthesis — conditions, habits, or shared responsibility.
Write your response on paper or in a notes app first. When you are ready, read the example below.
Example response
Study structure and detail — do not memorise phrases.
Example response (about 420 words — discursive)
Primary-aged students live in a world where messages, videos, and games travel in the same pocket as their house keys. Whether that pocket should stay open all day is one of the most argued questions in staffrooms and kitchens.
On one hand, phones can connect families and support learning. When a bus is delayed, a single text can stop a parent waiting in rain. Some teachers use approved apps for quizzes and language practice; students who enjoy making short films or digital art may find tools that do not exist on paper. It could be argued that banning everything outright would punish responsible use and ignore how technology already shapes the jobs students will one day consider.
In contrast, unlimited access often collides with childhood needs. Notifications pull attention away from instructions; group chats can host unkind comments that follow a child home. Perhaps the quietest harm is sleep — screens lit late at night delay rest, and tired students struggle with patience and memory the next morning. Alternatively, social media can train young people to measure worth in likes, which is a fragile currency.
Schools sit in the middle. Teachers report students "checking something quickly" while safety rules are explained; parents report battles over screen time that replace homework with arguments. The context suggests the problem is not the metal device but when and how it is used — and whether adults model the habits they expect.
It is possible that a primary student can learn digital skills without owning a public social profile. Some families delay accounts until later years; others supervise closely rather than forbidding conversation. Schools might teach digital citizenship while keeping lesson hours largely screen-free, so practice happens with guidance rather than in secret.
Ultimately, smartphones and social media are not going to disappear from Australian life. They might belong in primary-aged childhood only under conditions: clear rules at school, phones away during sleep, adults who discuss content instead of only confiscating it, and students who learn that connection is valuable but not the only thing worth their attention. The goal is not to pick a team for or against technology — it is to grow people who can use it without being used by it.
Why this works
- Discursive not persuasive — explores benefits and harms; conclusion sets conditions rather than banning or promoting blindly.
- Stimulus used — bus delay, lessons, parent conflict echo the context box.
- Transitions — "On one hand", "In contrast", "Alternatively", "It is possible that".
- Reflective synthesis — shared responsibility and habits, not a knockout slogan.
Give Your Child the Best Chance at Selective Entry
Join NSW families preparing their children for the Selective Schools Placement Test with the most realistic online Selective practice tests available. First tests free—no credit card required.
Claim Your Free Selective Practice Tests